How do the sources you've chosen relate to each other? Do they approach your research question from a common understanding of the material, argue for different interpretations, or propose different solutions? Are you sources talking to each other? (Check publication dates and works cited for evidence.). Is the author doing original research, like interviewing subjects, or is the work based on secondary research that has already been published?.How does this article or book relate to the scholarly conversation on your topic? (For example, does this work break new ground in the field, respond to previously-published material, or recap already-published materials?).Does the author employ a certain research method (like historiography, critical discourse analysis, or ethnographic research) or employ critical theory (feminism, Marxism, queer theory, cultural studies)?.Can you identify where this article or book falls in the scholarly conversation? Here are some questions to consider: Scholars communicate with and respond to each other and to scholars that came before them. Theoretical base/school of thought/place in the scholarly conversation: Research does not exist in a vacuum.Analysis of the article or book: What are the main points of the article or book? What evidence does the author use to support his or her thesis? Are there other arguments being made outside the main thesis?.The author’s thesis: What is the author's main argument?.Author’s credentials: Who is the author? Where did he or she study, and what degrees does he or she hold? What position does the author hold? How do these credentials allow the author to speak authoritatively about the subject?.Each of your annotations should be about one page long and contain:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |